?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous 10

May. 10th, 2018


commie_gardener

Wikileaks: Hillary Clinton ordered U.S. diplomats to spy on UN leaders

How Hillary Clinton ordered U.S. diplomats to spy on UN leaders

Hillary Clinton ordered American officials to spy on high ranking UN diplomats, including British representatives.

Top secret cables revealed that Mrs Clinton, the Secretary of State, even ordered diplomats to obtain DNA data – including iris scans and fingerprints - as well as credit card and frequent flier numbers.

All permanent members of the security council – including Russia, China, France and the UK – were targeted by the secret spying mission, as well as the Secretary General of the UN, Ban Ki-Moon.

Mar. 20th, 2018

galaxy

madman101

The Eye in the Storm

Despite Possible Blowback, Snowden Decries Anti-Democratic Forces in Russia



"My friends tell me it is dangerous to criticize the Russian government the same as I criticize my own. But each of us are given a limited number of days to make a difference. Life is a choice to live for something, or to die for nothing." - Edward Snowden

RT - ‘Dictator’ Putin wins ‘fraud-tainted’ vote: Western media sticks to narrative on Russian election

Nothing new here - White House claims it doesn’t dictate how other countries operate

Funny, When Obama Harvested Facebook Data On Millions Of Users To Win In 2012, Everyone Cheered

I was looking for an alternate to the above but this is similar(!) - Crisis manager questions why Trump's use of social media data is 'sleazy' and Obama's 'innovative'

Cambridge Analytica’s use of Facebook data was a ‘grossly unethical experiment’

Snowden: Facebook Is a Surveillance Company Rebranded as ‘Social Media’

“the head cheerleader for waterboarding” - Snowden: New CIA Head Might Face Arrest in EU Over CIA secret prisons and Guantanamo Bay

Edward Snowden: I Can Live With Being Sentenced to Guantanamo

11/2015 - Glenn Greenwald: Why the CIA is smearing Edward Snowden

26 Reasons Why You Need to Start Paying Attention to Edward Snowden

Jan. 26th, 2018

abe boombox

madman101

Julian Assange asks UK court to drop his arrest warrant

Julian Assange asks UK court to drop his arrest warrant

"Before the start of court proceedings, Mr Assange's lawyer Gareth Pierce told reporters the warrant should have "no status" because the proceedings in Sweden had come to an end."

& did you catch these ?....

Mystery as Julian Assange's Twitter VANISHES early on Christmas Day sparking a wave of conspiracy theories about whether the Wikileaks founder had 'been silenced'

Snowden’s Haven app turns smartphone into anti-spy sentinel (VIDEO)

Assange Reminds The World That Facebook Did Collude In 2016, But With Hillary

Assange accuses Spain of conducting ‘world’s first internet war’ to shut down Catalan referendum — RT News

Unredacted Clinton emails to be reviewed in court, despite State Dept. resistance — RT America

High Ranking CIA Agent Blows Whistle On The Deep State And Shadow Government

Chelsea Manning says she was denied entry into Canada - BBC News

NSA Leaker Called Trump A “Piece Of Shit”, Is A Fan Of Bernie Sanders | NewZSentinel

WikiLeaks: Global extinction in 20 years as magnetic north heads towards the equator | Ancient Code

Scientists have just detected a crack in Earth's magnetic shield | Ancient Code

Assange: Real Threat To US Is Not Russia But Israel | PopularResistance.Org

Jan. 11th, 2018

cheers - crackie

madman101

One step closer to a pardon!

Ecuador grants Assange citizenship!

May. 19th, 2017

galaxy

madman101

Assange Off One Hook

Julian Assange: Sweden drops rape investigation



He could face trial in the US over the leaking hundreds of thousands of secret US military and diplomatic documents.

Nov. 12th, 2016

tiger

madman101

Julian Assange Issues Statement On The US Election Day

By Julian Assange - November 8, 2016

In recent months, WikiLeaks and I personally have come under enormous pressure to stop publishing what the Clinton campaign says about itself to itself. That pressure has come from the campaign’s allies, including the Obama administration, and from liberals who are anxious about who will be elected US President.

On the eve of the election, it is important to restate why we have published what we have.

The right to receive and impart true information is the guiding principle of WikiLeaks – an organization that has a staff and organizational mission far beyond myself. Our organization defends the public’s right to be informed.

This is why, irrespective of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election, the real victor is the US public which is better informed as a result of our work.

The US public has thoroughly engaged with WikiLeaks’ election related publications which number more than one hundred thousand documents. Millions of Americans have poured over the leaks and passed on their citations to each other and to us. It is an open model of journalism that gatekeepers are uncomfortable with, but which is perfectly harmonious with the First Amendment.

We publish material given to us if it is of political, diplomatic, historical or ethical importance and which has not been published elsewhere. When we have material that fulfills this criteria, we publish. We had information that fit our editorial criteria which related to the Sanders and Clinton campaign (DNC Leaks) and the Clinton political campaign and Foundation (Podesta Emails). No-one disputes the public importance of these publications. It would be unconscionable for WikiLeaks to withhold such an archive from the public during an election.

At the same time, we cannot publish what we do not have. To date, we have not received information on Donald Trump’s campaign, or Jill Stein’s campaign, or Gary Johnson’s campaign or any of the other candidates that fulfills our stated editorial criteria. As a result of publishing Clinton’s cables and indexing her emails we are seen as domain experts on Clinton archives. So it is natural that Clinton sources come to us.

We publish as fast as our resources will allow and as fast as the public can absorb it.

That is our commitment to ourselves, to our sources, and to the public.

This is not due to a personal desire to influence the outcome of the election. The Democratic and Republican candidates have both expressed hostility towards whistleblowers. I spoke at the launch of the campaign for Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, because her platform addresses the need to protect them. This is an issue that is close to my heart because of the Obama administration’s inhuman and degrading treatment of one of our alleged sources, Chelsea Manning. But WikiLeaks publications are not an attempt to get Jill Stein elected or to take revenge over Ms Manning’s treatment either.

Publishing is what we do. To withhold the publication of such information until after the election would have been to favour one of the candidates above the public’s right to know.

This is after all what happened when the New York Times withheld evidence of illegal mass surveillance of the US population for a year until after the 2004 election, denying the public a critical understanding of the incumbent president George W Bush, which probably secured his re election. The current editor of the New York Times has distanced himself from that decision and rightly so.

The US public defends free speech more passionately, but the First Amendment only truly lives through its repeated exercise. The First Amendment explicitly prevents the executive from attempting to restrict anyone’s ability to speak and publish freely. The First Amendment does not privilege old media, with its corporate advertisers and dependencies on incumbent power factions, over WikiLeaks’ model of scientific journalism or an individual’s decision to inform their friends on social media. The First Amendment unapologetically nurtures the democratization of knowledge. With the Internet, it has reached its full potential.

Yet, some weeks ago, in a tactic reminiscent of Senator McCarthy and the red scare, Wikileaks, Green Party candidate Stein, Glenn Greenwald and Clinton’s main opponent were painted with a broad, red brush. The Clinton campaign, when they were not spreading obvious untruths, pointed to unnamed sources or to speculative and vague statements from the intelligence community to suggest a nefarious allegiance with Russia. The campaign was unable to invoke evidence about our publications—because none exists.

In the end, those who have attempted to malign our groundbreaking work over the past four months seek to inhibit public understanding perhaps because it is embarrassing to them – a reason for censorship the First Amendment cannot tolerate. Only unsuccessfully do they try to claim that our publications are inaccurate.

WikiLeaks’ decade-long pristine record for authentication remains. Our key publications this round have even been proven through the cryptographic signatures of the companies they passed through, such as Google. It is not every day you can mathematically prove that your publications are perfect but this day is one of them.

We have endured intense criticism, primarily from Clinton supporters, for our publications. Many long-term supporters have been frustrated because we have not addressed this criticism in a systematic way or responded to a number of false narratives about Wikileaks’ motivation or sources. Ultimately, however, if WL reacted to every false claim, we would have to divert resources from our primary work.

WikiLeaks, like all publishers, is ultimately accountable to its funders. Those funders are you. Our resources are entirely made up of contributions from the public and our book sales. This allows us to be principled, independent and free in a way no other influential media organization is. But it also means that we do not have the resources of CNN, MSNBC or the Clinton campaign to constantly rebuff criticism.

Yet if the press obeys considerations above informing the public, we are no longer talking about a free press, and we are no longer talking about an informed public.

Wikileaks remains committed to publishing information that informs the public, even if many, especially those in power, would prefer not to see it. WikiLeaks must publish. It must publish and be damned.

Source: zerohedge.com

Oct. 24th, 2016

xmas /eek /crazy - psycho xmas duck

madman101

WHO DONE IT?

Although it is clear that Wikileaks has not been known to release false documents, the DNC and Clinton campaign, along with cooperative media, threw up a smokescreen, claiming that Russia was responsible for the leaks, (and so the hacks into the DNC). Since Russia has been painted as evil for the past several years, and is known to do nasty spy stuff, (just like our government does), then the Wikileaks documents could not be trusted as being true. (That reminds me of when the Sanders campaign was blamed for a casual breach into the DNC computers which mainly harmed the Sanders campaign).

As soon as the DNC hacks and leaks were made public, the head of the Clinton campaign was on NPR, talking like a reporter, over and over claiming that the Russians did it. "Experts say the Russians did it!"

Still, now, even the upper levels of military intelligence are trying to convey the idea that, "Russia did it," when they have no evidence to support their duplicitous words. (See article linked below). So, the media speaks in the same regard. And so, Wall Street rises on the prospect of Ms. Clinton being elected - (by the powers that be).

So - who, really, is responsible for the leaks? Wikipedia is just a messenger - handing off the information - as a middle-man, (and for that, Ecuador cut off Assange's internet, necessary to his free speech journalism). I find it rather odd, that in all of this cloud of media and blame, it has never occurred to anyone that Hillary Clinton, herself, was responsible for the leaks. Why?

Remember all the news about Clinton mixing her personal and private servers, exposing classified government information to possible hackers? Um. That's exactly what happened.

I don't know how many of you feel as disturbed as I do, over the games that are being played here, which are consistent with games going years into the past, but considering that Clinton represents the global corporate establishment, garnering money from prominent Republicans, etc., while pretending to be Bernie Sanders, I feel that she is the last person this country needs to be president. But, I am ahead of myself. What I am presenting for you here is a not-so-heavy look at the whole hacking controversy, and why we all need computer privacy. As far as WHO DONE WHAT - there are a few links exploring that topic.

There are some good leads for you, as far as finding ways to strengthen your own security on the internet...

Dear Clinton Team: We Noticed You Might Need Some Email Security Tips


Read more HERECollapse )

OK - Besides wikileaks.org, and DCleaks, and Guccifer2.0, here is one more link for you: The Electronic Freedom Foundation. And - don't forget: Be sure you have a strong firewall, and customise it in a very anal fashion. My firewall was made in Russia - just like LiveJournal! (lol)

Oct. 19th, 2016

galaxy

madman101

"The Most Important Conspiracy Book in Decades"

Shell Game by Scott BennettText of Review HERE, includes good links...Collapse )

Oct. 18th, 2016

galaxy

madman101

Man your internets!

After Ecuador cutting Assange's internet, there may have been a raid on the Embassy, with Assange subsequently being flown to Smithfield Airforce Base in the USA.  (We all know of Obama's vendetta against whistleblowers).  So, check out what is going on - (I have to go to bed).  Some sources: Reddit, Anonymous, Clyde Lewis "Ground Zero," - & wikileaks.org?  After all the blaming of Russia, and Russia preparing for nuclear war, things are getting hot and may spin out of control.  (Also see my previous post on Assange).  Debate tommorrow night.  I hope it all comes down.

Oct. 17th, 2016

abe boombox

madman101

Assange is Dead?! - Walking into war...

These rumours come up: Paul McCartney, Hillary Clinton, God. That's right - there was an internet rumour, about two weeks ago, that Hillary Clinton was dead, and using a basketful of body-doubles to fill in for her. So, I know to steer clear of these things. But now, there is a rumour that Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, which has been leaking the DNC, Clinton and Podesta emails, is dead - because certain "deadman codes" were released, (see article).

GOING VIRAL=> RUMORS JULIAN ASSANGE IS DEAD — WIKILEAKS POSTS DEADMAN’S KEYS


What do I think is going on? This give me a chance to sing...Collapse )

In the Democratic Echo Chamber, Inconvenient Truths Are Recast as Putin Plots

I will be posting soon about the possibility of war.

Previous 10

May 2018

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com